jenn
Junior Member
Posts: 74
|
Post by jenn on Dec 19, 2019 21:07:27 GMT -8
New information was obtained from the California Division of Workers Compensation DIR office where jjd filed a claim on July 21, 1979 following his firing from the Auburn Police Department for shoplifting. What's interesting about this is the fact that the file shows his address as Hackett Ave., Long Beach and NOT Citrus Heights. Usually, workers compensation claims are confidential. However, once the claim is appealed it then becomes public record. Knowing jjd's narcissistic personality I surmised that he appealed the decision and sure enough,evidence is there in the computer system! I can tell by the VOC file numbers, though, that he was referred for vocational training instead of collecting on the workers comp claim.
In the interview with Chief Willick, the chief indicated that jjd filed a workers comp claim claiming that Willick made the work environment too stressful for jjd.
|
|
|
Post by johnnyhands1 on Dec 19, 2019 21:39:31 GMT -8
Good work! So does that mean he lived at the Hackett Ave. residence the entire time he was down south (from 1979 to 1985-86, or so - with breaks, I guess, going back up to Sac for periods of time)?
Before this discovery, what was the earliest proof of the Hackett Ave. residency, does anyone know?
Does anyone know if this residence was/wasn't owned by someone in his family?
|
|
|
Post by meadowssylvan on Dec 19, 2019 21:47:20 GMT -8
Yes, I read that in the LA Times article. He qualified for retraining because of his termination and because he was law enforcement. He would be unlikely to be able to work in his field ever again so that’s what qualified him to receive retraining. My question is where and what vocation did he receive his training? Was it in his vocation that he retired from at Save Mart? Or was it something else like the commercial diving we heard about from Paul Holes, he mentioned something about PG&E diving.
|
|
jenn
Junior Member
Posts: 74
|
Post by jenn on Dec 19, 2019 22:12:04 GMT -8
Good work! So does that mean he lived at the Hackett Ave. residence the entire time he was down south (from 1979 to 1985-86, or so - with breaks, I guess, going back up to Sac for periods of time)? Before this discovery, what was the earliest proof of the Hackett Ave. residency, does anyone know? Does anyone know if this residence was/wasn't owned by someone in his family? JH, I think jjd was back and forth between the years 1979 and 1986 for a few reasons. 1. his name shows up in local (Sacramento) directories during that time and 2. He got into a physical fight with someone in 1983 in Sacramento (well documented court case 1983-1985) 3. He was at my window in 1983 Regarding earliest proof of the Hackett Avenue address, I've never checked. That house was rented.
|
|
jenn
Junior Member
Posts: 74
|
Post by jenn on Dec 19, 2019 22:24:12 GMT -8
Yes, I read that in the LA Times article. He qualified for retraining because of his termination and because he was law enforcement. He would be unlikely to be able to work in his field ever again so that’s what qualified him to receive retraining. My question is where and what vocation did he receive his training? Was it in his vocation that he retired from at Save Mart? Or was it something else like the commercial diving we heard about from Paul Holes, he mentioned something about PG&E diving. Meadow, I believe his training was in diesel mechanics. That was his job at Albertson's/Save Mart in Roseville. I've never found any evidence whatsoever that he was a commercial diver! EVER! The Auburn Journal article that announced his engagement mentioned that jjd had an affiliation with N.A.U.I. but I checked with several N.A.U.I. executives and jjd was never associated with them in any capacity. N.A.U.I. keeps immaculate records and every person ever associated with their organization since their inception in 1960 is assigned a number starting with Al Tillman (NAUI #1). wAww.naui.org/about/our-heritage/National Association of Underwater Instructors. jjd was NEVER an instructor, even though he lied to people about that fact.
|
|
|
Post by johnnyhands1 on Dec 19, 2019 22:52:58 GMT -8
Good work! So does that mean he lived at the Hackett Ave. residence the entire time he was down south (from 1979 to 1985-86, or so - with breaks, I guess, going back up to Sac for periods of time)? Before this discovery, what was the earliest proof of the Hackett Ave. residency, does anyone know? Does anyone know if this residence was/wasn't owned by someone in his family? JH, I think jjd was back and forth between the years 1979 and 1986 for a few reasons. 1. his name shows up in local (Sacramento) directories during that time and 2. He got into a physical fight with someone in 1983 in Sacramento (well documented court case 1983-1985) 3. He was at my window in 1983 Regarding earliest proof of the Hackett Avenue address, I've never checked. That house was rented. yes, back and forth between the two places - a better way to describe it. I'm thinking this means JJD/SH maintained two residences the entire time from 79-86 or so (though Hackett Ave was primarily for JJD.) The phone listings don't really prove anything - since they owned the house since 1980, there's no reason to change the phone number, as long they kept paying the bill - so the phone company never has a reason to not list them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2019 14:22:44 GMT -8
Thanks for discovering and sharing this, Jenn!!!
Was it not discovered that Sharon got her law credentials from a private college in Sacramento?
Why would JJD use the Hackett address in July 1979?
If Sharon was in college and living in Northern California in 1979, JJD could use the Hackett address because he didn't want those papers being delivered to his home in Auburn so Sharon wouldn't see them...?
Man, this story. It's like peeling back the layers just to uncover another head-scratching mess. I hope that city of Sacramento, or the state of California can get JJD just to spill everything.
|
|
|
Post by steelbike on Dec 20, 2019 15:03:43 GMT -8
Poster meadowssylvan posted on the other board a receipt for fishing gear that JJD had ordered, the shipping address was his Citrus Heights address but the billing address was in Exeter— presumably a family member’s address. JJD always obfuscated.
|
|
|
Post by dougguard on Dec 21, 2019 13:48:53 GMT -8
Jen:
Excellent work! Now I am mystified? WC claims are for industrial injuries related to the job. Not for being terminated for misconduct. I pretty much knew the rules back then. Before we go on, I have to remind all that Sharon was still at McGeorge when this claim was filed. So her employment likely was not involved with Southern California.
If JJD filed a claim against Auburn PD? This would be cited in the heading. If you have the case number? Please post or post private to me. More than likely the claim was filed against an employer after Auburn PD. I always highly suspected there was a WC claim in the mix from a long time ago, and your find is very important. Don’t bet that the cops already know this? To put many of us at ease, we can assume he was just a “long range” stalker like he was from Auburn to San Jose.
Very interesting. I shall return.
|
|
|
Post by dougguard on Dec 21, 2019 13:55:10 GMT -8
Just as a side note. Two blocks away from Hackett Avenue in Long Beach is another Ralph’s?
|
|
jenn
Junior Member
Posts: 74
|
Post by jenn on Dec 21, 2019 16:56:44 GMT -8
Jen: Excellent work! Now I am mystified? WC claims are for industrial injuries related to the job. Not for being terminated for misconduct. I pretty much knew the rules back then. Before we go on, I have to remind all that Sharon was still at McGeorge when this claim was filed. So her employment likely was not involved with Southern California. If JJD filed a claim against Auburn PD? This would be cited in the heading. If you have the case number? Please post or post private to me. More than likely the claim was filed against an employer after Auburn PD. I always highly suspected there was a WC claim in the mix from a long time ago, and your find is very important. Don’t bet that the cops already know this? To put many of us at ease, we can assume he was just a “long range” stalker like he was from Auburn to San Jose. Very interesting. I shall return. Doug, If you watch the interview with Willick, you will see where Willick talks about how jjd filed the workers comp claim because jjd claimed that Willick caused him too much stress on the job. The basis for the claim was "work related stress". The workers comp claim had nothing to do with the shoplifting charge. jjd also filed a separate claim against Auburn PD to try to get his job back but he dropped that after he was found guilty in Sacramento County Superior Court. The only reason I was able to grab the workers comp info is because the narcissist appealed the claim, thereby making it a public file. There are actually two files in the system related to this July 21, 1979 claim. File number VOC49***** and VOC49***** (not posting entire file numbers intentionally). Normally, workers comp claims do not begin with VOC, as the clerk told me. So that was unusual that they showed up there to begin with. I only wish I could get my hands on the EDD file!!! Unfortunately, that won't happen without a court order. So, I did something else which would cause the State to review the EDD file. The outcome of that will remain confidential but, at least I know I did what I could to force the State to review all of his EDD claims back through through the years 1979 - 1990.
|
|
|
Post by dougguard on Dec 21, 2019 20:43:40 GMT -8
Thank you for straightening this out for me. I should have done my homework prior to comment. Again, Excellent work Jen.
|
|
|
Post by dougguard on Dec 21, 2019 20:56:50 GMT -8
Just another side note. In California Public Safety employees are presumed injured when they file a stress WC or Medical Retirement. The burden is on their employer to prove otherwise. For the rest of us, the rule is in reverse. Stress claims are the number 1 reason for retirement.
Speaking of Willick, you guys are aware he spent the better part of his career making the case of a Placer County Sheriffs Deputy who killed his wife in the City of Auburn.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2019 12:12:33 GMT -8
Did Clarence Huddle own the home on Haskett or am I mistaken?
|
|
jenn
Junior Member
Posts: 74
|
Post by jenn on Dec 23, 2019 14:11:33 GMT -8
Rgnnbld, I have not pulled property deeds for the Hackett Ave. house so I do not know who owned it.
|
|